Recently in Op Ed Category

Introverts unite

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
Because I am about as introverted as one can get this post at Kottke.org got me thinking and inspired a bit of mental dialogue such that I decided to put it here for anyone and everyone to read.

Most people ( read extroverts ) understand introversion, and introverts, as in-depth as they do quantum physics. I expect that this is largely because people are fucking lazy pricks who really don't care about much outside of their own little sphere of existence. And that's ok - I don't hold it against them . . . ok I do, but I'll explain that another time.

The vast majority of people will use the words introverted and anti-social as if they are synonyms. Ergo, the vast majority of people are idiots. See, those two things aren't even the same - they're like apples and roast beef. Introversion is an element of personality and anti-social is actually a personality disorder that is generally believed to afflict a large percentage of the people in criminal populations.

Allow me to further explain . . . generally speaking introverts find social interaction a draw on them physically. It is physically exhausting to interact socially - especially when it is small talk, meaningless drivel or simply gratuitous conversation for the sake of eliminating uncomfortable silence. Those afflicted with anti-social personality disorder are people who view the victims of crime as people who deserved what they got because they were weak. Another word you could use to describe those suffering from this disorder is "sociopath."

Admittedly the entire reason I'm writing this post is due to the fact that the misunderstanding about introverts and the classification of introverted behavior has impacted me personally and recently. As much as an extrovert would view my behavior as reclusive or boring, I view their behavior as obnoxious and self-indulgent. It's clearly a difference on the same scale as Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus.

Clearly, however, there is something inherently wrong with extroverts.

Why is it that extroverts cannot be comfortable in silence? I understand it's energizing to them when they find themselves engaged in conversation regardless how mundane or trivial, but just once they should try to experience a moment in the sanctuary of silent reflection. Just because they see someone who is not talking doesn't mean they're waiting for an extrovert to engage them in conversation. In case they haven't heard, it's not all about them. I know that flies in the face of what they've convinced themselves of over the years, but trust me, speaking solely for myself, I'm just not that into them. Now that might really kind of piss them off, but really, seriously, how many times has an extrovert started some kind of stupid conversation - maybe it was at work, about your kids or something else they pretended to really care about? Now, when was the last time they started that same conversation and asked you the same questions they had asked before? See it isn't as if they care, it's because they have something to gain from the conversation. It energizes them, re-charges them - they are the Dracula to your inner life force and they are going to suck you dry - and not in the way that you might appreciate. Worse yet, the only reason they started the conversation was so they could discuss their favorite subject . . . them. If you're not careful you'll be in the path of climax directly resulting from their conversational masturbation. It really is as if they just can't shut the fuck up.

I really didn't want this post to turn into a rant, but I guess it ended up that way didn't it? It isn't as if introverts aren't friendly people though. I'm just as likely to smile and nod, hold the door to the elevator or wave at my neighbor. Hell, every now and then I don't mind chiming in when the conversation is nothing more than, "Whew, sure am glad it's humpday, ha ha ha. . ." I'm under no delusions believing I'm in the minority - hell, I'm quite positive I'd be the first one voted off the island . . . to a nice quiet place.

Stop watching the TV and vote!

I know. What in the world could he possibly be talking about?

Every once in a while you have to pull yourself away from the idiot box and walk into the real world. And I don't mean to go get another bag of Cheetos or to use the, ahem, facilities.

It's time to grab a clean shirt, comb your hair and GO VOTE.

Look at it this way. Make it a celebration of the fact that we won't be seeing anymore pundits talking about who might win what state because of some scandal or bit of gossip anymore. We won't have to watch all those ads about why this guy or that guy is better than him or her because who didn't do what or whyfor.

It's time to pick the next leader of the free world. Play a part in history.

Get your ass up off the couch and GO VOTE. DO IT NOW. The polls are open until 7 - although you might want to check in your area.

Hurry up, daytime TV sucks anyway.

Sarah Palin coming to a talk show near you?

So I'm reading through some of the posts that arrive in my feed reader . . . and I come across a post from TvbytheNumbers citing a Hollywood Reporter article announcing that Hollywood is all set and ready to snatch up Sarah Palin given the ratings from last week's SNL appearance.

Like Robert, I too expected this to be the case. I mean she has the on-camera presence, the hype surrounding her veep candidacy has elevated her name recognition to astonishing levels ( I mean seriously, who heard of her before she became McCain's running mate? ), and there's enough controversy surrounding her that if you haven't heard of her, you probably have heard about something she did . . . or said.

So, let's assume that Obama wins the presidency and Palin goes on to finish her term of Governor of Alaska. Her term ends in 2010. Will she still have the name recognition she enjoys now in 2010? I'm sure she wouldn't let a little thing like governorship get in the way of the money Hollywood would love to throw at her. Just think of the wardrobe budget she could have with the millions any one of the networks would bestow upon her - and she wouldn't have to donate that to charity.

While the Hollywood Reporter article suggests that many executives believe the Fox News talking head path would probably be the best way for her to go, they aren't necessarily writing off the chance of a talk show like Oprah's daytime show.

So if she did do some kind of talk show, I can't help but think it might end up something like Bob & Doug McKenzie and their "Great White North" panel show on SCTV ( I used to stay up late just to watch them in the 80s ). She could sport a tuque and give out the moose report all the while slipping in passages of, "Drill, Baby Drill!" Every now and then I suppose she might invite a few lipsticked, pit bull, hockey moms so they can trade, "You betchas!" discussing the latest trends in cleaning hunting rifles or how best to preserve a manicure while gutting a seal.

So . . . any thoughts on this? Is this where television is going? Would you watch her show?
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Op Ed category.

News is the previous category.

opinions is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.